I have seen some speculation that Rush Limbaugh could sue for libel and defamation but that’s really not Rush’s style. Sure he could and he would have an uphill battle but it could be done. There are however a couple of other options that would be more interesting…
Rush could get angry and put together his own investment group to counter Mr. Checketts bid. Rush has the contacts with enough people who would be able to put together a bid for any NFL team out of petty cash. He could put together a bid to blow any other completely out of the water and then really force the hand of the NFL. Would the NFL really turn down a high bid for a team because it included someone who the NFL deems politically incorrect? Rush could be the majority owner and outright run the team and be the face of the St. Louis Rams. Yes Jerry Jones’ ego would have to take a back seat but that’s probably a good thing.
The NFL has long overlooked and forgiven law breakers, animal abusers, wife beaters, drug problems, etc. The NFL doesn’t have a problem with that but they won’t allow a minority owner who makes his living in a completely legal way, who dares to speak the truth about the racism that exists in sports media.
Rush could also take the high road and use this experience to drive him to push even harder on the 2010 elections to remove some of the mindless idiots from Congress that are part of the problem, and the 2012 elections to remove Obama from office.
The fact remains that Rush is still the most powerful man in media and can affect elections, maybe it would have been better for Obama if Rush was busy as an NFL owner and less focused on defeating Obama and his mind numb robots running congress…
For eight years former President George W. Bush and his administration worked hard at trying to keep terrorists out of our country. Oh what a difference ten months makes, we go from a strategy of killing terrorists around the world to promoting terrorists (in Honduras) and willfully bringing them into the country. The Democrats in Congress claim that people are more worried about the economy and healthcare. Really, are there truly that many Americans willing to trade security for an improved economy and healthcare?
I guess so, after all that’s what the majority has voted for. I am certain that these terrorists will be tried in New York, Chicago, San Francisco. Places where they are certain to receive a “fair” trial by impartial, yet highly liberal, anti war judges and juries. All so in the end they can parade these poor terrorists in front of the cameras so they can tell how Bush falsely imprisoned them for all those years. After which they will return to Pakistan to resume planning the next attack on America.
At the rate we’re going the terrorists might actually have a chance. They’ve weakened America to the point where we not only let them back into the country but we spend tax payer dollars to fly them here. This is the same 1990’s thinking that led to the attacks on 9/11.
We learn from history that we learn nothing from history.
– GEORGE BERNARD SHAW
After 233 years haven’t we as a society reached a point where can end discrimination? Why must people be segregated based on race, religion, social status, or politics? The new head of the NFL Players Association seeks to bar a private citizen from investing his money in an NFL team for what reason? Simply because this citizen dared to exercise his first amendment right of free speech and pointed out the hypocrisy of the sports media in America and their hype of a quarterback in Philadelphia simply because of his race.
So Rush Limbaugh was asked to participate in a perspective ownership group looking to buy the St. Louis Rams. He’s a private citizen; he has made his money legally. Rush has no ties to gambling or other entities that are barred by the NFL unlike other owners whose family businesses include gambling. St. Louis gets a part owner with ties to the area, someone that has done more for the sport than most of the people in it. That’s not enough apparently, today to be an owner you have to be liberal. You have to promote the socialist policies of a President and a Congress that seeks the destruction of everything the country was founded upon.
Rush had made a comment on ESPN back in 2003 referencing the quarterback in Philadelphia that the medias interest in this quarterback was because they wanted to see a black quarterback succeed. The statement wasn’t racist, in fact it Rush was pointing out the racism by the sports media. They are overtly racist, were then, are now. That hasn’t changed. In the years since we were treated to glowing stories about Tony Dungy being the first black coach to win Super Bowl. We weren’t treated to the stories of how wonderful a coach Tony Dungy was and the masterful a job he did at not only building the Tampa Bay Buccaneers organization that went on to win a Super Bowl the year after he was shown the door, but the job he did in rebuilding the Indianapolis Colts into a Super Bowl Championship team a couple of years later. The focus was only about his race and not his skill and that is a shame.
Who did Tony Dungy owe his success to, his own hard work, his players, his staff, the ownership group that supported him, the fans. Not just those who happen to be black.
Rush has been successful in an entirely different field. Does he owe his success only to himself, only to the white members of his hard working staff, only to his white listeners? No Rush owes his success to his hard work, his hard working staff of all races and genders, and his listeners, millions of listeners who are White, Black, Latino, Asian, etc.
I have heard Tony Dungy speak about success, and race is never part of that but the media doesn’t hear that they only look at his race. I have heard Rush Limbaugh speak about success, race isn’t part of that either and again the media doesn’t hear. The media has been in the business of speaking so long that they have grown tone deaf to what the people actually think and believe.
Much like our government.
It comes as no surprise that President Obama won the Nobel Peace Prize. This committee of socialists has a long rich history of rewarding the intentions of socialists rather than their results. After all this is a committee that has ignored true efforts towards peace exhibited by US Presidents such as Reagan, Truman, and Bush 43 in favor of those American Presidents and Vice Presidents that have proven to make things worse, Carter, Gore, and now Obama.
Our path to peace in first nine months of the Obama administration has led us to increasing failure in Afghanistan. The Taliban has managed to gain strength; Obama has weakened the CIA more in nine months than Clinton did in his first four years. Iran has been able to accelerate its nuclear program to a point where it is now a serious threat and all Obama can do is throw away the missile defense plan for Eastern Europe. North Korea has thumbed its nose at us again knowing full well that Obama doesn’t have the stones to confront them in a serious way.
These are not paths to peace; these are paths to more severe conflicts in the future. This is a “bury your head in the sand approach to foreign policy” that will result in larger conflicts down the road. Never mind the disaster that is the Obama domestic policy, Obama hasn’t succeeded at anything other than getting elected and collecting awards based on “Hope” not results.
The time has come to get rid of the imbedded reporters traveling around Iraq and Afghanistan. As we’ve seen this week the media can’t take care of themselves and we have thousands of troops that protect people that 95% of the time don’t report the truth on the ground anyway.
Our brave men and woman are over there in harms way are fighting to protect our freedoms. They shouldn’t have the added burden of protecting a reporter who chances are takes freedom for granted anyway. The media needs to get out of the way stop getting in the way and stop putting the troops lives at risk. Never again should a member of our armed forces die or be injured protecting a member of the media in a war zone.
Let the troops fight! Bring the media home!!!!!!!
Hillary opening a trip to India illustrates the weakness of the Obama foreign policy by demanding other nations start battling terrorism.
via FoxNews
"It must be stopped," she said, adding that the United States cannot do it alone.
Do it alone? What planet is Hillary on? Obama has gone out of his way to close down the war on terror. He has weakened our position in Iraq and Afghanistan. His policies in closing Guantanamo are putting terrorists back on the front lines to kill more innocent civilians as well as American soldiers. Hillary says the US can’t do it alone? I would suggest that the policies of Obama are to not do it at all…
As if that wasn’t enough Hillary didn’t have the sense to stop there.
"The bottom line for me is, our government is committed in the fight against terrorism,"
"And we expect everyone" who shares the American desire to end violent extremism "to take strong action to prevent terrorism from taking root on their soil and making sure that terrorists are not trained and deployed — and we believe that around the world."
Really, what American desire? America went out of it’s way to elect the antithesis of ending violent extremism. The voters took the bailout and elected a Commander in Chief who in the first six months weakened our country and took us right back to the mentality and circumstances that led to the attacks on September 11, 2001.
Mrs. Clinton maybe you and the President should concentrate on what America can do to fight terrorism rather than berate our allies for not doing enough.
It’s been sixteen years since Hillary’s assault on healthcare. That assault led in part to the Republican takeover in 1994 but one has to look at the differences between today and sixteen years ago.
In 1993 Bill Clinton ran on the economy and succeeded in beating George HW Bush on that issue in spite of the fact that Bush had in fact led the country out of the recession by the election. Clinton felt he was invincible so he let his wife take on the issue of healthcare. The thing that Clinton underestimated was that the economy was already rebounding and people were positive on the economic situation. As such people didn’t see healthcare as that big a problem that required a government takeover and as such it went down to defeat.
So we move forward to the last eight years where we have had a drumbeat of Democrats, in congress and the media, telling people just how bad everything was. This in spite of the fact that for much of the George W Bush years the economy has been booming. The media succeeded in talking the economy into recession in late 2008 along with a democrat controlled congress that created the mortgage mess.
We now have the perfect storm for Democrats. They have created circumstances where we have unemployment near 10%, we have healthcare costs through the roof mostly because trial lawyers have driven the cost of malpractice insurance through the roof. We have government takeovers of the auto industry, and the banking industry. We haven’t seen misery like this since the days of Jimmy Carter.
So now there is a narrow window of opportunity for Obama and Democrats to pass socialized medicine. i call it a narrow window because the have to be careful, they have to orchestrate this takeover and spin it so it appears that they are helping everyone. If people perceive this for what it is, another power grab by liberals and Obama then they could see a backlash. People are already weary of the takeovers they’ve seen in the automotive and banking sectors.
The Democrats running congress are talking of big tax increases, the global warming bill isn’t widely supported by voters but congress is beholden to the environuts that elected them. The more they force this stuff down the throats of the American people the greater the consequences in 2010 and 2012.
So in the end it appears that Democrats have created the circumstances under which socialized medicine may be possible. Maybe they learned from 1994 but will the country be better off from the lessons learned? I doubt it.
Joe O’Biden not wanting to be outdone by the likes of amateurs like Al Franken illustrated his own stupidity today with the following statement:
People look at me and say, "What are you talking about, Joe? You’re telling me we’ve got to go spend money to keep from going bankrupt?" The answer is "Yes,"I’m tellin’ ya.
Yes folks the Vice President says you can spend money to keep from going bankrupt. Where is this in the State Run Media? No where. These are the same people that railed that Bush was an idiot, Dan Quayle was an idiot, Sarah Palin is an idiot, etc…. Every time O’Biden opens his mouth Obama must be holding his breath thinking “what is this mental midget going to say next?”
If these people weren’t so dangerous when they have power it would almost be tolerable for the entertainment value, but these people are running the Banks, the auto industry, and they’re not done yet… They have they’re eyes on healthcare next…
We knew it wouldn’t take long for Al Franken to embarrass himself and the half of Minnesotan’s that voted for him and we haven’t been disappointed…
From Breitbart.com
Franken told Sotomayor that she was "the most experienced Supreme Court nominee in 100 years." He said her story is inspirational and one in which "all Americans should take great pride in."
The stupidity of such a statement is beyond the bounds of rational thought. Granted she has a very inspirational story but last time I checked that wasn’t a qualification for Supreme Court Justice or course neither is race or gender and both of those seem to be qualifications in the Obama administration. As for qualifications for the actual job, no. She isn’t even as qualified as the last 10 nominees to have the nomination pulled or rejected. Given the way the current court smacked down her latest decision one could make the case that she isn’t qualified for the job she has now.
Unfortunately she will probably be confirmed and that is a shame. It is clear from her record that she allows race to enter into her decision making. It’s clear that she allows her liberal ideology to enter the decision making more than she does the law, more than she does the constitution.
Maybe it’s something about July 4th that causes us to reflect on heroes of our past but do we not see the heroes of today? A hero is a person who fights for those they do not know, a hero fights for their family, a hero fights for their country regardless of how ungrateful a large portion of them may be. Our men and women in uniform both at home and abroad are there to protect our rights, our beliefs, our constitution. Regardless of your political beliefs they deserve our respect, our admiration, and our support.
Heroes are also those that we rely on at home, firefighters and law enforcement. Many of the nations firefighters are volunteer living and working in small towns across America. Rarely do we look at firefighters as volunteers but many of them give up off time from their regular jobs for training and other exercises never mind that they answer the call to a burning structure at 2am. In many cases they are first on scene to auto accidents and have to deal with some pretty horrific scenes on our nations highways.
Contrast that with political leaders (of both parties) who look at themselves as heroes. Some have fought for our country as members of the military and deserve our respect for that. However few have distinguished themselves in the political arena in a way even remotely classifying themselves as heroes.
I was on a flight this weekend in the Pacific Northwest, leaving Seattle, on this flight was a young man on his way home for two weeks from Iraq. Now being the Pacific Northwest, an area not known for respecting members of our military, I had not expected anyone to notice or say much to this man but was pleasantly surprised. As we were making our decent the flight attendant leaned over and told the man “thank you for your service and all you do” as I got off the plane I patted his shoulder and said thank you to a man I don’t know, who is home for two weeks with his family before he returns to a battle in a far away place.
As we take our vacations, long weekends, days with family, etc this summer please remember that somewhere in a far away place there are real heroes who wake up every day helping to secure not only our freedom but the freedom of people in other countries who aspire to have it but are not strong enough on there own to achieve it. For they are today’s heroes….
